Wednesday, 7 March 2012

Pro photographer owns Maddy photos! Why?

Here is one result from an internet search. If you google :Madeleine McCann photographer , you will get lots more results. This early article below was raising the question: Is Paul Grover the same man as the one from the professional photos agency? I can assure you now that we were a lot of people to search on this, and the answer is: Yes!
So why is that? Why were all these 'dolled up' pics taken by this professional photographer? To which goal? And whoever good parent would want to have such a photo like this below taken?
Doesn't this seriously araise curiosity, if not severe suspicion, to the mind, when we know that all these pics were sold at top-wack price to the press - was this a whole pre-organised strategy 'just in case' this kid would go missing by any chance? Or is it pure coincidence?.... In any case , I think that NSY (The Met) should need to ask this child's parents about the need to pay a photographer, who usually SPECIALISES IN CELEBRITIES and other VIP's, (so imagine the BILL it must have reached... for people who needed to serve themselves out of their public fund to pay 2 months of mortgage, it's rather STRANGE, no?) - and possibly quizz this man too, Mr Paul Grover, and his agency. Collect statements and compare them - and I've just been told that the 'heavy blue eye-shadows' is also from the same photographer. Information to check upon, and I would welcome details about this, if true.
Many photographs of "Madeleine McCann" have triggered angry comments among the public, who has massively described these pics as 'heavenly material for paedophiles'. -See forums and other internet comments and reactions since 2007.- Photos have always been a key function of the campaign " Find Madeleine"..., even these that did not portrait the child as she was looking like at the time when she went missing. The early posters showed a much younger child, not to mention the interesting statement of Silvia Batista: http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t19640-to-clarify-where-the-twins-were-sleeping-on-3rd-may-silvia-batista-s-statement-mccannfiles

"[...] As she said earlier she was alerted about the disappearance of Madeleine between 22.30 and 23:00. She was at home and was informed of the event via a telephone call.
She drove immediately to the Ocean Club where she arrived a few minutes before elements of the GNR popped in.
After she arrived she went immediately to the apartment A5 where she found several people inside the apartment and outside of it. She entered in the flat but soon left without having spoken with anyone, because she was informed that elements of the GNR were in the principal reception. She went there to meet them.
When she came close to the elements of the GNR she found that behind her was
Gerry, Madeleine's father, accompanied by another man whose identity she doesn't remember. Then Gerry kneeled down, hit the floor with both hands, positioning himself as if he were a praying Arab, and screamed twice of anger, what he said being impossible to understand. Then Gerry stand up and accompanied her (the witness) and the other man in the car of the GNR to the apartment A5.
She entered the apartment and asked for the passports of all elements of the family, and also photographs of the missing girl. She went with Gerry to the GNR car to hand over the requested documents. She mentions she did this, as well
as other tasks, at the request of the GNR Commandant, because she could translate their questions and the missing girl's family's answers.
She remembers Gerry gave the Commandant of several photographs of the missing girl. They were postcard-like pictures, taking into account their size and shape and seemed all the same to her.
She understood also that since the very beginning either Gerry or the others insisted on stating that Madeleine had been snatched, all using the word "abducted" instead of missing, and all showing much interest in informing the press of the situation. [...] "


"27.12.07

[source: http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/2007/12/strange-picture-of-madeleine-from-paul.html ty Paulo]

A strange picture of Madeleine, from Paul Grover (*)


Is this the same Paul Grover from REX FEATURES, "Britain's leading independent photographic press agency and picture library, supplying a daily service of news, celebrity, features, and stock photos to all national newspapers, magazines, TV, web and other media in the UK and in more than 30 countries worldwide"? Or is it just a coincidence? The picture was posted at one of the several sites organized and promoted by a McCann special support group, a secret organization which has members in more than 25 countries. The site was set up on May 9th, just six days after Madeleine McCann disappeared.

21 comments:

  1. I think they released those images as a threat to others to come on board.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Come on board ? Aboard what exactly ?

      Delete
    2. "Erm", Su.... are you Suzan Healy by any chance?

      Delete
    3. cum on them fotos can b totally innocent ye I say there abit bad taste but innocent sayin that PARENTS GUILTY

      Delete
    4. What a crock of shit, only someone with a twisted mind would see anything wrong with this photo, loads of kids play dress up with make up and this pic could have been taken when she was tired and lying down about to fall asleep.....and "Erm" Jemny....are you an idiot by chance?....Just answered my own question I think...

      Delete
  2. "Erm, Su"... "As a threat"? What do you mean, how could this be a threat? In which way? I mean, really, if they think this way, like these pics could be interpreted by people as a threat, they are even more twisted and touched in the head than I thought they were!
    Can't they see what these pics revealed about themselves? What are they prepared to say when confronted to a judge who will ask them why they put such photos of their daughter onto the wide net? Maddy head tilted, lying on the floor, top of the stairs.... Maddy sucking on a big, giant ice cream, loking like she wears make-up.... Maddy COVERED in make up and even showing traces of tears, head tilted again, looking so still that some ppl think she was dead on that pic!
    What's all this about? Has it got to do with the John Shord incentive, which was a total fabrication? "Stranger took photo of Maddy then she was taken"...... Paul Grover took provoking photos of Maddy at the order of her parents and then, she was taken....

    Please, please explain your "threat" thing! By all means we all want to know!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you look through other comment. You will see " su " has posted ' Don't blame the parents '

      Why not su ? Can you explain that ' gem ' also.
      So its ok for people to leave toddlers on their own in an apt abroad ? Karen Mathews is in prison and she only hid Shannon under a bed. At least Shannon is alive. Or is it all Madeleines fault because we have not to blame the parents ? I think su needs to get a grip on reality. If it wasn't for Madeleines parents SELFISH actions Madeleine would still be here today. The FUND is also a reg company that used only 13% to "search" for Madeleine. The rest is used to sue anyone who challenges the McCanns version of events. The saddest part is they are still allowed to raise two more children. Its disgusting.

      Delete
  3. Yes, these photographs of Madeleine are not nice. The make up pic was bad taste. First it was claimed Madeleine raided the make up box and in Kates novel lol it was a travelling beautician that done the make up. Blatant lies again. The McCanns wouldn't know the truth if it came up and bit them on their cowardly bums.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Football shirt photo copied from the Soham case. Seems like the McCanns take parts from other peoples real life tragedies and makes them their own story. Cos they haven't got a real story of their own.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Been looking it up a bit, bloody hell, yeah, everything is there, confusion, football shirts, pills, CAR BOOT, and even a.... NOSE BLEED!!!!

      -now how curious the McCanns' friends were accusing Murat of behaving like Huntley... imo they have been really inspired by this case to come up with that, + too many coincidences. And as I see it, it was them the 'team mccann' who did behave like Huntley, stalking the investigation (to sabotage it better!)

      Delete
  5. Begging bowl - fund - begging bowl - fund - begging bowl - fund begging bowl - fund.
    FUND - to sue anyone who does not believe in the abduction LIE.
    The McCanns did not protect their children - They were not there for them.

    Its time the BRITISH GOVERNMENT put a stop to this circus and start PROTECTING THE PUBLIC FROM - THE McCANNS.

    ReplyDelete
  6. su: "I think they released those images as a threat to others to come on board."

    Looks like this su person knows exactly what those controvercial photos of a little girl are portraying, ie; paedophilia and a paedophilic network with power, enough power to get help from the UK Gvmnt and the British Military with a CAAT order to prevent damaging evidance on the McCann's getting exposed by the Freedom of Infomation Act due to public interest in the case... this means the IRA, the sale of military arms, money laundering from the public purse to pay for illegal arms deals and holding the Gvmnt to ransom by catching them on video with little children, ie; Operation ORE, and the McCann's and Co, including Jim Gamble and the Tapas Crew running the entire game right in front of our faces!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, I've searched, asked around and received this from a Friend: http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/03/mccann-case-freedom-of-information-act.html
      It's such an interesting, massive piece of information, I think I'll make a blog post out of it or share it anyway in the Home Page here.
      I'm so greatful that you have posted this Comment, dear Anonymous, and then to my riend who has helped me out tonight towards it. TY to both of you! X
      -it seems that you are really spot on, as there is a line in the 'table' (bit after the photo on Joana MORAIS's blog/web post, see link above) that stipulates as a 100% SURE, that the UK/GB MILITARY is involved in the McCann case!!!: " (CAAT v ICO & Ministry of Defence EA/2006/0040) " section 23 of the aforementioned table.

      ICO (Information Commissioner Office) "v" (? I don't know what 'v' means in this context) MINISTRY OF DEFENCE !!!!! Now WHAT has the MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (Of a TERRITORIAL COUNTRY [GB] has to do with the Child Madeleine McCann case????

      Delete
  7. they shud b lie detected why havnt they already been any other person in a similar situation wud ov been

    ReplyDelete
  8. i can not understand how come they are still walking a round after what went on when they were all on holiday they left them 3 children in that flat or what ever ya want to call it all by there self if that would of been any normal couple off a council estate we would be in jail and the rest of the kids removed with out a dout after reading and watching what is said and what i have read i can not understand how come they are still free so so wrong

    ReplyDelete
  9. What utter nonsense, they are photo's every parent has of their child, they look completely innocent photographs, anyone saying they are 'heavenly for peadophiles' needs to sort their own filthy minds out.

    ReplyDelete
  10. These are pictures released by the family as part of their desperate search for their missing daughter, in the hope that someone will recognise her. As a professional photographer for a national newspaper Paul Grover would have been supplied the images to pass on to his publication, there is nothing sinister about it. This article and some of the comments below are incredibly misguided and naive and potentially damaging to the hunt for Madeleine, not to mention the fact they look like they've been written by an eight year old, with puncuation and grammar a schoolchild would be embrrased by. I suggest you focus your efforts not in scaremongering and gossip and instead helping to find this missing girl and ending her family's agony,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The comments are more than naive. They are downright ignorant. There is nothing in this, or any photo, that suggests Madeleine was abused. Sick people with sick minds will find sickness in the most innocent of images.

      Delete

  11. This is an intresting blog that you have posted, you shares a lot of things about Professional Photographer London,Wedding Photographers In Hampshire and Professional Photographic Services.Which are very informative for us.Thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are all talking rubbish!

      Delete
  12. This is not how the original photograph offered by the McCanns looked at all. It has been photoshopped to make innocence look like abuse, There is nothing unusual about Madeleine's photograph 'belonging' to a professional, because of the simple fact that the said 'professional' was given the photos, and was responsible for having them published. That's standard practice in the media. The real photograph shows an innocent Madeleine 'dressing up' with make up. In the actual photograph, she has a very faint purple marking under her right eye - like most children do, when they are a bit tired. I work with abused children and I can tell you that Madeleine McCann is not one of them, She looks profoundly happy and well-loved in the many photographs we've seen of her, and it is my opinion that people who set up sites like this one are 'sick'.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for leaving a comment: