Sunday, 27 March 2011

Whats Wrong With Madeleine's Neck?...Take A Closer Look!

Well here it is, the deliberate use of a paint program to cover up something very sinister on Madeleine's neck, and it's on the original photo that the McCann's published themselves!

So what is being covered up on Madeleine's neck on this photo, because it look's like someone's attempted to paint out what could be strangle pressure marks with a photoshop manipulation program, and if it's not strangle pressure marks, then what is it and why?

The McCann's are invited to give us an answer!

15 comments:

  1. http://fakedabduction.com/2010/03/the-author-on-paul-drocktons-blog-talk-radio/

    'Brian: Sure, sure, well Goncalo Amaral he erm, he puts forward the theory that she climbed on the sofa and fell off while unattended erm, I personally don’t believe that, you know, but who am I to say…if she died in the apartment erm, there was some erm reports and early reports in September of 07 talking about a blood spray pattern on the wall er [commencing'] a fractured larynx so you know…

    Paul: I’m sorry, a fractured…’

    Brian: Larynx in the throat. There’s a branch of forensics that can examine erm you know, where a wound was inflicted from the blood spray pattern on the wall or something.

    Paul: Are we talking about literally, I mean this is, you know I’m going to ask the questions, but we’re talking about she could have had her throat slit’

    Brian: Ermmmm….I mean, I mean there is no particular evidence in the files or anywhere to say if she died how it occurred and erm, I mean one of the cadaver dog also alerted in a flowerbed outside the apartment er, the veranda was about, I’d say, about eight feet above ground level, so she could have climbed and fallen off and fallen into a flowerbed for example. You know, there’s numerous theories…

    Paul: the bottom line is you’re talking about a blood splatter pattern here that seems consistent with someone who er, I mean, if you fracture larynx erm, that’s not going to spray blood, if someone cuts yer that’s going to spray blood and so, I mean this again, I’m just speculating here. But the point is, there’s plenty of evidence there for a, for a criminal investigation and that’s the bottom line is that there hasn’t been one'

    Mmmmm!... so it's a slit throat that the Mccann's have deliberately covered up with a photoshop paint brush on Madeleine's neck!

    Errmm... Mr UK Cop, are you awake to this obvious evidence of murder or is Kate writing out your perscriptions for Heroin on a Free NHS perscription!

    ReplyDelete
  2. it definitely looks to me too that it's an attempt to mask finger marks, 3 clear fingers -prints on the right and a thumb mark on the left,wow.... Really good finding Ka. I don't agree with PJ's theory either, kids don't die from falling from 1 meter high if that, or not that likely as attracting the "need" to get mentioned so loudly and 'definitely' in a police file conclusion anyway.
    THAT would make it so SIMPLE...there was a (vanishing?) article from a PJ leak as stated... mentioning FINE LARYNX SPRAY....and that photo was never released until 3 years after the 3rd May 2007...her eyes look weird on that...
    it shows clearly on the thumbnail too that marks exits, I had spotted some as well and they can't pass that as make-up, cause little girls are careful not to put make-up on their necks, they copy their mums, + I never believe that 'dressing table raid' porky, there are LOTS of photos were well-applied make-up is evident. I know how kids put make up on, used to do it myself, + seen lots in my family do it for a laugh, hiding from their mums or me, lol, it wouldn't look like that at all, and the kid had been crying just before.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yep, there's definately finger marks across her neck, and a thumb mark on the left side of her chin, like a left handed person had grabbed her across the neck and forced her head to the right with such force it left severe bruising of the hand mark, and someone's tried to conceal the bruising with an image tool, perhaps in photoshop Pro or a similar program on a pc or laptop. The splodges the tools made over the bruise marks is pretty evident, not a very professional cover up at all, pretty much a rush job as far as I can make out.

    I don't think the PJ is actually saying that Madeleine might have fallen of the back of the sofa and accidently hit her head or face on the window sill, I think he's just hopeing by trying the softly softly approach to that surgestion in hope that one of the McCann's would come out with what really happened, cause your right, kid's are pretty resilient when in accidents, falling from one metre off the back of the sofa wouldn't have the force behind it to cause an injury that sprayed blood up to the ceiling, head injuries have very little blood cause there's no major blood vessels in the scalp, and being that it was a spray of blood, notably jugular, then that would be impossible that type of injury would occure, being that sofa was the same height as the window sill, and Madeleine of 3-4 year's of age, would be less than a metre fall from the sofa to the window sill, and even less force that she would have probably had a bit of a bump on her head, and that certainly wouldn't have killed her. Another thing, for a jugular spray to reach the ceiling from a child that young, Madeleine would have had to be undergoing some from of severe attack for that type of blood pressure to occure, basically she'ed have been wide awake and aware of being attacked, and from the bruising on her neck and chin and being held down forcibly, holding the jugular under pressure, then yes, her blood pressure was raised considerably in her brain, and ony a very sharp knife, or scalpal used in a certain way at such an angle and speed across the jugular at the same time as releasing the pressure on the neck hold, would then create that kind of high velocity spray of blood. There's a lot of clues you can deduce from blood stains, like the following:

    * Movement and direction of persons or objects while they were shedding blood.
    * Position of persons or objects during bloodshed.
    * Movement of persons or objects after bloodshed.
    * The mechanism or object used to create a specific pattern.
    * The direction a stain was traveling when it was deposited.
    * The area of origin of an impact pattern.
    * The minimum number of impacts during an incident.
    * The sequence of events.

    ReplyDelete
  4. But following the high volume of persons that entered the McCann's apartment before the arival of the GNR officers and the PJ, not forgetting that someone or perhaps several persons had spent some considerable time cleaning up the apartment after the blood was depositied, plus the fact that the Mccann's were screaming 'Abduction' every 5 seconds to divert the GNR and PJ from investigating a homocide, is it any wonder that forensics had a hard job of determinging much from what was left and deliberately contaminated by the Mccann's and their friends!

    Lol, my daughter got into my make up bag at about the same age 3-4 year's old, and it wasn't just the eyeshadow she had a play with, and although it was all over her face, something resembling a mushed up triffle and a mud pie on a plate, there wasn't any on her neck at all, so your right there megafundline, kids that age wouldn't look at their necks in a compact mirror whilst applying their Mom's make up, they'ed just use it on their faces. But on this photo of Madeleine, it's not make up, as with blood loss, either from strangulation or a jugular cut on her throat, the first area's to lose oxgenated blood flow, the red blood, would be the eye area, being that the skin is much thinner around the eye's than anywhere else on the face!

    I'm pretty much sickened about this photo, especially the fact that the Mccann's have published it illegally in the public media, throwing the face of their dead or mostly dead child in front of our faces and then claiming their daughter is alive, is pretty much psociopathic, cause this photo could be some other child that's practically dead or dying and their own child alive and safe playing happily with her Wendy House in the Mccann's home in Rothley, and it beg's the question of how the Mccann's can get away with porducing a photo of a dead or dying child in the public press and not one professional person, detective, coronor, physician or anyone has noticed... are they all on drug's and brain dead that they can't deduce the bloody obvious!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Could you tell me why publishing this photo was illegal?

      Delete
  5. Another thing... if this child on this photo had been crying just before it was taken, where's the red puffed up cheeks? There's not one facial muscle tension either, which is what you'ed get from being dead, which is evident from her lifeless eyes, so why havn't the Mccann's been arrested for this childs death, or at least murder, cause do they expect us all to get off on necrophilia like they do!

    ReplyDelete
  6. This photo surgest to me that Kate and Fiona's expertise in anesthetics in the NHS has been involved in making ilegal Snuff videos with children and making profit out of it!

    ReplyDelete
  7. In my Opinion, the LP ENGLISH POLICE OFFICER JOHN SHORD has sent the investigation onto a derailed track intentionally to protect the McCanns further, as THEY, the McCanns, SAID FIRST that they were watched and STALKED and MADELEINE (WHY JUST MADELEINE AND NOT THEIR 3 KIDS??!!) PHOTOGRAPHED. BY STRANGERS... on a fucking beach.... without the parents doing anything and, bizarrely, not even reporting this to police THEN!

    at the time I did some consistant search work and suspected from my results that the MCCANNs were into SOME SORT OF INTERNET BUSINESS BEFORE "THE ABDUCTION".

    AND LOCAL/ WIDENING TOO... cause their ways are STRANGE in all this and towards KIDS too, their own, and their approach on public sites, very inviting OR threatening, employing stupid gitts on the cheap that try to gather INFO (FACEBOOK, YOU TUBE and eveywhere else they can cheaply access) -AND TO TRY AND DISSUADE PEOPLE FROM FINDING THEN EXPOSING THE TRUTH!

    THAT is MY OPINION. I have grounds for it since 2007. I have GENUINELY NOTICED ALL THIS, and am not the only one, we regularly get insulted in video comment, censored in FORUMS LIKE ON JILL HARVERN'S, even exposed with our finest private info on specially made sites! (like the JATIKS = "Just a thought you know" = ALL EX MEMBERS OF THE THREE ARGUIDOS FORUM!)

    Kate is shadily getting plenty Mothers on the net to think it's ok to LEAVE KIDS UNATTENDED "PROVIDED IT'S SAFE".
    WHAT NEXT? COFFEE MORNING IN ROTHLEY?

    Or in Resorts abroad? Posher.

    I'm imagining the further bit... How long could this been on?! having a 'girly morning' "between us", sack the kids (not for a change obviously), they are SAFE, and see what happens,,, anything anyone, white wine ladies? meanwhile the kids get in costumes, make-up for the girls, Knock- Knock at the door: HI BRIAN! HI TONY! HI GORDON! HI RICHARD! This way, Wooopss, nothing happened, pays out, wooosh!

    happy with your extra 200 quid ladies each? bit tipsy so early? come again... was all fun, girlie ans sexy, you've loved it, ask your kids. Or use 'MY' method, kids don't have a say, HERE, an icecream and a teddy, mmmmh! -or a GOOD SLAP IN THE FACE MORE LIKE- Daddy won't grumble it will help him stay home on Friday pretending he's on sick, mum did extra jobs this week, all is OK in the UK!

    Facebook makes a wonderfully free platform for these sorts of inviatations I would again imagine, and for free ADS FOR THE COMING BOOK, and for GOADING as to incite YOUNG MOTHERS to REALLY THINK IT'S SAFE LEAVING KIDS UNATTENTED WITH "TURNS OF CHECK"!

    ReplyDelete
  8. All true Megafundline... it's like Gerry and Kate are promoting the reverse psychology of good parenting, like it's safe to leave one's children in an unlocked apartment in a foriegn country for anything up to 5 hours at a time and for 6 nights in a row... oh it's ok to let paedophiles take photos of them on the beach, Gerry love's that kind of thing, and will probably get a profit out of it somewhere, being that they were there out of season and booked into a hotel that specialises in Adult fun that time of the year, stuff the kids and just get back to the fun despite whose the monster raptur hiding behind the kids bedroom door... yet if parents behaved like that at Butlins in Skeg Ness the Social Services would be locking them up in 10 seconds flat! And wasn't it Kate that first mentioned to the media that Portugal didn't have any laws on paedophiles... how the fuck did she know that?!!!... I never knew that till I heard it come out of Kate's gob on Sky News, and if she and Gerry knew that before they took their children there, isn't that parental negligence anyway, especially the fact that they stated that Madeleine was being photographed on the beach at Sagres, and didn't even bother informing the police about it, as if they were deliberately being obvlivious to it and it would have spoiled their fun having to fill out a police statement cause they'ed miss their piss up with their NHS TapHeads at the Tapas Bar... is that really good parenting. cause I'ed say that's how dog's treat their puppys!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Madeleine looks so sad and her parents didnt search for her. Utterly disgusting. They are diabolical. I think they knew what happened and she wasnt coming back. Mr Smith said he saw Gerry. He stated that and no matter what the mccanns do to sway witnesses. Mr Smiths word from Sept 2007 is set IN STONE.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yes. The Mccanns have tried to sway everyone to think what they done to their children as acceptable parenting. Well, ITS NOT OK. It is utterly DISGUSTING ans STUPID. Why are they not in prison ? Yes it was mentioned about a blood spray pattern leading to slit throat. Its about time the Mccanns got a reality check by having a good long look at themselves. They will see the cold hard truth. That they are rwo very deranged schitzos that need locking up as soon as possible. What a sick photograph. Very disturbing but that's the noem with that diabolical pair. Evil personafied.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I am not saying that this is what happened here i am just saying that bondage can be used in sex. I am not suggesting this happened to this little girl.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The hands around the throat is a common method used in bondage and also a common method used for pedo's to get off when sexually abusing children. Asphyxiation while raping children.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for leaving a comment: